Neuroscience - AI Training - Leicester, UK

Role overview Review AI-produced graphical abstracts against neuroscience research papers to help preserve scientific accuracy and the integrity of technical summaries. This is a flexible, ad hoc expert evaluation project that involves reading scientific literature and assessing how well visual and written summaries represent the source findings.

Responsibilities - Compare scientific papers with AI-generated graphical abstracts. - Fact-check whether the abstract faithfully reflects the paper’s findings and claims. - Assess the accuracy and structure of visual and textual representations of technical concepts. - Complete a paid qualification assessment using a sample paper and graphical abstract.

Requirements - Deep subject-matter expertise in neuroscience. - A master’s or PhD in neuroscience or a related field. - Experience with fact-checking and strong attention to detail.

Nice to have - Prior involvement in AI training or evaluation. - Experience with scientific publishing or peer review.

Benefits and work setup The project is remote and ad hoc, with flexible participation. The listing states compensation starts at $40 per hour; candidates must pass a paid skills assessment.